<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Enlightenment on despatches</title><link>https://icle.es/tags/enlightenment/</link><description>Recent content in Enlightenment on despatches</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:42:17 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://icle.es/tags/enlightenment/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Design</title><link>https://icle.es/2008/12/12/design/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:42:37 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://icle.es/2008/12/12/design/</guid><description>&lt;p>Admitting to being a techie - I have often overlooked design. In fact, I have
often explained to (potential) clients, using the analogy of a ferrari that we
make the engine and everything else work while somebody else makes it look
gorgeous. For me, how something looks was largely irrelevant - as long as it
worked well.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>This explains why, for a long time, I used a fairly bland desktop environment.
My desktop itself was just pure black with no wallpaper. Ironically, I would
remove all the icons, so it would be pure black and nothing else.&lt;/p></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admitting to being a techie - I have often overlooked design. In fact, I have
often explained to (potential) clients, using the analogy of a ferrari that we
make the engine and everything else work while somebody else makes it look
gorgeous. For me, how something looks was largely irrelevant - as long as it
worked well.</p>
<p>This explains why, for a long time, I used a fairly bland desktop environment.
My desktop itself was just pure black with no wallpaper. Ironically, I would
remove all the icons, so it would be pure black and nothing else.</p>
<p>This should have tipped me off on my own desire for design. I thought my desire
for black stemmed from the &ldquo;good old&rdquo; days of DOS when the screen was black and
my love for the linux terminal. As an aside, I used to reconfigure the terminal
windows in X to have a white on black background as well - so much better for
the eyes. In fact, I still don&rsquo;t understand why everyone uses a white background
for terminals and such like. Paper was white because that was easier. There is
really no reason for the screen to be white too&hellip;</p>
<p>Now, this was before I bumped into
<a href="http://www.enlightenment.org/" title="Beauty at your fingertips">Enlightenment</a> (at
this time, it was E16) and to put it bluntly, I was captivated. This was
absolutely gorgeous. Fairly unusable since I was used to
<a href="http://www.gnome.org/" title="The Free Software Desktop Project">GNOME</a> and of course
Microsoft Windows. I thoroughly enjoyed this until it became more of a
distraction&hellip;</p>
<p>I ended up reconfiguring GNOME to be prettier - in fact, I had the Mac OS X
theme for a while which I enjoyed.</p>
<p>I then dabbled with E17 and it was absolutely gorgeous - E16 paled in
comparison. I ran into a bug where some java applications would jump a few
pixels when changing the decorations. This was a real pain since I was
developing a Java application at the time. I spent an entire day trying to &ldquo;fix&rdquo;
this before I realised that it was E17 screwing it up and not my code&hellip; :-(</p>
<p>More recently, I thoroughly enjoyed
<a href="http://compiz.org/" title="A Compositing Window Manager">Compiz</a> with the shaky
windows and such like - I just always wished that I could actually throw a
window and watch the momentum carry it that extra distance.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, this bridged the gap enough to E17 to keep me happy for a little
while.</p>
<p>Last week, I dabbled with E17 again to see if the issue with Java was resolved.
To my surprise E17 had changed more or less completely - it was bridging the gap
between a window manager and a full fledged Desktop environment.</p>
<p>However, there was a problem. It looked like I couldn&rsquo;t get it back to its old
glory of absolutely fantastic graphics without some effort in configuration. One
other issue I ran into was that maximising a screen would fill it up across both
my monitors. Another thing I could configure but then, it all seemed like too
much effort.</p>
<p>E17 gives me the feeling that this is where user interfaces will end up - it
automates so many of the things that makes it quicker to do anything. However,
it still lacks some of the &ldquo;basics&rdquo;.</p>
<p>E17 is a very good example of a UI that tries to conform to what I call the
&ldquo;<a href="https://icle.es/2008/12/12/invisible-interface/" title="Invisible Interface">Invisible Interface</a>&rdquo;
which I will be writing about later.</p>
<p>To bring it all back to now, I found it a hassle to go through all the available
themes for WordPress for the Company Blog as well as my own.</p>
<p>I used to take great pleasure in going through dozens or hundreds of themes and
picking ones that I liked but after doing it a few times (for Firefox,
Thunderbird, my phone, GNOME, GDM and my flat), it gets a bit repetitous.</p>
<p>Now, for a wish. A website that pulls in all the different themes for all over
the world for everything. A one-stop-theme shop. Here, I could go through and
pick a general theme that I liked and download it for all the applications, my
phone(s), mp3 players (and of course, taking it to the next level, all the
gadgets at my flat).</p>
<p>That gives my life more uniformity. Perhaps this is something that Designers
could take on&hellip; Say Hugo Boss, and design something that even matches your
clothes, shoes, hair - everything.</p>
<p>That way, you could have your own unique branding&hellip; and while you are at it
link it into Gravatars and you are also instantly recognisable</p>
<p>Now for the issue of privacy - I think I best leave that for another day.</p>
]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>